I ended up laughing a lot last night at myself for remembering a lyric and
the circumstances I'd used them. Sadly, the reasons I was laughing were not
good; it was more 'hey, look, an applicable lyric and it showed itself
as such...'. Oh well. It won't actually mean anything to anyone who knows
me, but again it's just the things I associate.
Well, that's another new module written which is about as useful as a
chocolate teapot. To be honest, all that matters to me is that I've done
it and it was pretty stupid. It's hardly complete but that's not really
the point. Two RFCs, two RISC OS specifications and a lot of pain between
them. Hey.
I think I may have just written the most pointless email I've done for
a few years. It's amazing how poorly I can write when I'm just rambling.
Or maybe it's not amazing.
And the big news tonight is that Justin's got some new glasses. Yeah, it's
not all that thrilling, but it's nice for me because they're different. In
(slightly) keeping with the 'do things differently', I've got a very
slightly different look now, just by having different glasses. It's not
exactly a world shattering thing, but hey, it's new, it's different and...
actually it's expensive, but I'm kinda reliant on my eyes, so I think that's
probably worth it .
And that's the entirity of the news today. Amazing.
It's 2:30am and I'm thinking about bed now; I really want to get on and do
some more on this rather interesting little challenge I've set myself but
I'm thinking I'd do better in bed.
There's not a lot else to say about today though.
It's a Sunday. They're like a wilderness in the week. And it's not helped by
being a bank holiday tomorrow. But anyhow, I've made reasonably good use of
it by having an eye test, getting (or expecting to get) new glasses and
going to see "Hitch Hikers Guide To The Galaxy (2005)Adventure, Comedy, Sci-Fi Everyone has bad mornings. You wake up late, you stub your toe, you burn the toast...but for a man named Arthur Dent, this goes far beyond a bad day. When he learns that a friend of his is actually an alien with advanced knowledge of Earth's impending destruction, he is transported off the Earth seconds before it is exploded to make way for a new hyperspace motorway. And as if that's not enough, throw in being wanted by the police, Earth II, an insane electronic encyclopedia, no tea whatsoever, a chronically depressed robot and the search for the meaning of life, and you've got the greatest adventure off Earth.Hitch Hikers Guide To The Galaxy"
at the cinema.
Dad'll bring my glasses home in the week, once they've been done up.
All that said, I did seem to spend a lot of the day cursing, so maybe it's
not quite as 'busy' as I need to be to not be thinking as much.
The laptop seems to have died, which is a little frustrating. Well, that is
the laptop's fine, but the power supply brick's light flickers like mad when
it's plugged in and no power appears to actually reach the laptop. So it'll
be a call to Acer on Tuesday I expect. They've been helpful in the past, but
this may be a little much.
It does mean, though, that I can't check my email from bed any more. Maybe
that's not such a bad thing.
Seeing a reference to 'Jennifer Ringley', I did a quick search on google for
that with Jennipics. It seems that only a single reference to the old site
now exists on the 'net (excepting my own references, that is). It's
just a pity I wasn't around to have the ABC interview really. That would
have been... well, incredibly embarassing now, but it would have been nice
to at least have had a little bit of fame. Admittedly, it would probably
have resulted in a much stronger 'telling off' from the University, but if
you're going to make mistakes (and you've got to admit that I've made a lot)
you might as well make them real mistakes.
It's now far too late and I've been debugging a rather stupid filename
buffer overflow bug that took far too long to trace. Those are always a joy.
Nearly the end of the month .
I've just corrected a load of spelling mistakes in the August 2000 month because... well,
it really was quite astoundingly poor when I glanced at it.
Julian quoted Out of my life , by
Fish in his diary
today, so I rang him up to say that he screwed up by quoting the Fish
site... and he tells me that I screwed up, 'cos I've got the import cover
for Internal Exile , by
Fish on my site. Damn .
To be honest, I was sure that I had fixed that in the library. Hmm. It
is fixed, but it hasn't been propogated through to the diary site
it seems. I wonder why. Oh well, fixed now.
It reminds me, though, that I really need to sort out a permanent link to my
diary, because it's not particularly useful to have people referring to
entries in the 'index.html' when that's only valid for a month. David Chess
has a cute little box beside each week which when you click on it takes you
to that week's permanent page. I might do something similar. I also rather
like his way of styling linked images in brown, because that's the site's
primary style (yes, I know he's done other things, but it's nice to have the
entire site styled. Since my site is styled black and white, I could do that
as a style and only produce greyscale album covers. I'm not sure I'm keen on
that.
I had a quick search for David Chess on Google and amongst the many places
he appeared was
BlogShares which
seems kind of strange and interesting and... well, you have to sort of be
a bit sad to want to do those things, but I'm kinda sad so that'll do.
Julian
also commented that the lyrics seemed to relate to things in my life, or
lack thereof. Well, this months do, directly. Except for the
Roxette one.
Oh, and we had grand total of 3 'no' and 1 'yes' vote for people getting
emails when the diary's changed. So it's probably not worth my spending time
on.
Hot. Too hot today.
I noticed that the the NTLWorld account really is dead now; I tried the URL
and it's gone. The email addresses, I noticed, went a little time ago, so
if anyone has any references to it, change them. And of course, if you have
any 'movspclr' references lying around, they're long gone.
And by the time you see this, Julian's diary lyrics will have been corrected
anyhow. Not important.
It actually bothers me that by reading a lot of the diary, Caroline came to
the conclusion that I hate her. I know that's, like, two months ago, but it
bothers me. But having aside the other things that bother me, we come down
to that one which is minor and not really something I'm going to be
secretive about. I never was good at getting across things in words, so
maybe it's just that.
But still, it bothers me.
Interestingly, in that way that probably isn't all that interesting to most
people, the lyrics on
The Company
website for 'Out Of My Life' differ from those that are sung. The emphasis
is slightly different.
And a big three-cheers for RFC3927 which has finally made it into out of
draft ! In case you're not aware of every single RFC that goes through (!),
that's link-local addressing for IPv4, aka ZeroConf address configuration
(as provided by the ZeroConf module under RISC OS). The RISC OS module is
reasonably accurate to the specification, although it does use a earlier
draft for its implementation details. Somewhere lying around here I've got
a list of the things that different in the implementation to the RFC. I
believe the RFC was withdrawn for a little while whilst some of the text was
modified.
I didn't notice this before but the UNIT press
briefing about a 'Computer virus file sharing alert' (about a file
called 'ruffcut' ) is dated 10/03/05. The leaked first episode
appeared before that, but the BBC started investigating it (so they claim on
their own news site) on 08/03/05. It just amused me anyhow.
I've just realised that the lyrics on Imaginary , by
Evanescence are different on the
Origin and the
Fallen album
versions. The structure of the track has changed a little, but it's still
the same thing. I prefer some of the way the Origin version goes,
particularly I like the additional verse that isn't in the Fallen version.
The Fallen version follows a more common verse-chorus pattern (verse,
chorus, verse, chorus, verse, chorus) and even has the same lines bracketing
the entire track, whereas the Origin version runs slightly differently
(verse, chorus, verse, verse, instrumental, chorus).
I've copied the Estoy Aqui
lyrics to the server now, too, because they're quite cool. It's alongside the
Heart And Soul lyric
which also raises a smile. Every once in a while I try singing along to them
- I'm on my own so I can do that. It's not easy, but I like the challenge;
not only in trying to remember the words but to get them right when they run
so fast. The other one that's always a challenge is New Order's 'True Faith' because I can never
seem to get a breath in the right place. Which is all why I admire people that
are actually musical!
When scratching ones face during the cooking of tea, ensure that sharp
knives have been removed from hands. I managed to avoid stabbing myself in
the eye early through the wonder that are 'glasses'. I think it's that whole
not caring so much which is leaving me being careless.
And another RSS bug fixed today; 'linkto' elements now work properly when
used in the first paragraph of an entry.
How come
Counting Crows seem more depressing than
Archive at the moment ?
I've taken a day or so to try to do a rather complicated mini-thing in order
to prove to myself that I'm not shit. So far it's going 'slowly' but that's
partly because I've had to read a load of docs to see how to make things
work before I can actually make them work.
Nothing much to say today, except I updated the 'Friends' page with some new people and
amended the entries that were already present. Which isn't all that
impressive really. On the plus side, I've given Caroline an entry at long
last!
I'm also quite chuffed that I got a simple module up and running today.
It's nothing special; it just prints out a message when certain packets
are received. But it was a litle bit of pain to get working nonetheless,
and this is just one of those 'first stage' things.
I really didn't sleep well last night. I kept waking up every few hours. I
think it's just a more obvious form of my being restless. Oh well.
It's been a long time since I woke up to a screenful of new email. It seems
that the Atom list is very active at the moment so that's why I'm seeing
loads of things. It's strange to see so many people talking about these
things when they're ranging from the nit-picking to the intention-changing,
especially when they're trying to finalise the specification.
However, I've noticed from the discussion that my atom:id values have a
semantic I'd missed. Well I had missed it; it just turns out to not
be important to me. Fragment components on atom:id are still used as part
of the comparison for identifiers.
I've just added the relevant auto-discovery tags to the website and whilst
they'll actually direct you to the diary rather than anything else, that's
really all this site is useful for these days, so I'm not so bothered. Both
the RSS and Atom feeds are listed as alternates. The Atom feed reference
follows the draft-ietf-atompub-autodiscovery-01.txt document, and the RSS
feed reference follows the note given in the 2002
'Dive In To Mark' weblog entry as that seems to be the only decent
description of it - I can't find anything more authoritive.
I had a (brief) play with Opera 8's RSS handling. I'm not actually quite as
impressed as I was on initially looking at it. The integration of the
auto-discovery is great, but I'm not sure I like the way that it just treats
the articles as mail. What is it that makes it different from Feed Reader
for me then ?
Well, it doesn't appear to sort sensibly for a start. New articles appear at
the bottom of the list. Yes, you can toggle the date order that it sorts
with but that doesn't appear to be remembered between feeds, or between
restarts so you have to keep resetting it.
The dates on the articles aren't identified properly either. Dublin Core
date elements are seemingly ignored, which is I suppose fine in general but
FeedReader supports them. RSS 2.0 pubDate elements are supported, it
appears, but oddly it appears. The BBFC site uses RSS 2.0 and pubDate but
all its entries appear with the same date; by contrast, Drobe uses the same things and
appears to not work. What's the difference between the two ? The BBFC site
isn't, seemingly, valid. It's valid enough to be parsed but not enough to
be understood as valid RSS 2.0. Email sent to BBFC describing the fault so
it's possible they'll fix it - their people seem very helpful and competent
on the couple of occassions I've emailed them anyhow. I'd bearly managed to
write this paragraph before I got a reply from them thanking me and saying
that they'd fixed it now.
It can't import OPML (or OCS which seems to have generally been left alone
by the world - typical as that's what I implemented in my reader!) so I had
to re-enter all the feeds by hand.
Any articles that you've not clicked on (or held the keyboard cursor over
for a moment) are bold, and go normal after you've clicked on them (or held
the cursor over them). However, there's also a 'mark as read' option which
makes the text even less bold. And if you 'delete' articles, they're gone
for good. I'm not sure I'm keen on that.
It occurs to me that the 'Friends' page should actually say something about
Caroline. And some of the other entries should be updated these to be
correct. And some people I actually know now should be in there. They have
been real friends and I should at least acknowledge them. Actually the
'About me' page probably ought to be updated, too.
And the weekly search results this week had lots of things, but the top
entries were for GradeDraw, HighSchool, Caroline and RISC (in ascending
order). Thrilled ? I can see it in your face how enthralled you are at that.
I added two new classes to my project today, which are nearly identical and
share a whole bunch of code anyhow. Like most of the things I've done so
far, it's read-only. However, I hope to be able to do writable properties
soon. I know how, it's just that I've not got around to doing the 'set'
methods.
Dad's watching 'Kramer V Kramer' downstairs. I remember it vaguely from when
I was little. They liked it. I remember it being disturbing. I would have
been only little, I guess - the film came out in '79 so I'd have had to see
it a few years later on telly I suppose. I remember a lot of frustration, and
shouting, and unhappiness. So whilst I think it's probably a good film, it's
not one that I would want to watch myself.
I've done a simple converter from my
RSS to
Atom on the site now, which should be
correct. However, it's pretty much useless at the moment because I'm using
draft 8 of the specification which apparently only came out a little while
back. In any case, it'll make changing it for new drafts a little easier. It
does seem a little strange to be using a format that is useless to people,
but it will, in time, be useful, I'm sure. The Atom feed is linked just below
the RSS feed.
I had this little circular email from Sue earlier which was amusing and
scary. I'm not going to relate the details but they were... well scary.
The basic summary is that my favourite number is 17, Hannah is my Lucky star,
'Moonchild' is the song for Helen, and the song that tells me most about my
mind is 'Crawling'.
I'm reading the 'Atom syntax' mailing list now, so that I can get some idea
of where they're heading and how the process of standarisation works. I've
watched some bits of these things before with the SVG drafts, the SysLog
drafts, Link Local address allocation and a few others, but it's useful to
see how things work and to (maybe, if I actually understand enough!)
contribute.
I found my NaN problem too. It's obvious. NaN != NaN. The non-C99 compiler
works correctly according to the specification in that there is no real
understanding of NaN with respect to optimisations, but that's not a problem
for my code. It just means that I have to implement a simple 'isnan'
function to check my returns. No huge deal but a little bit frustrating
because such things (FP operations, that is) aren't exactly an area I have
much expertise in.
I had something I was going to say a moment ago, and it's gone. It'll come
back to me if it was important, but like so many things that you think and
go "oh, I'll write that down because it seems important", it never is
important and you forget it.
A few sentences recently - to myself, obviously - have been started with
"What if ...". Not the big "What if"s, like "What if there's a god and he's
laughing at us ?" or the slightly lesser ones like "What if we'd never
developed speech ?". And not the smaller ones like "What if it rains on
monday ?" (which would be scary and I'm really hoping it doesn't), or "What
if I run out of music to listen to ?" (which is just unlikely, really). But
the more medium ones like "What if blah hadn't happened ?" or "What if I'm
wrong about bingle ?" or the mildly frustrating "What if my memory fails me
and what I remember about ping is not right", or even - and this is the most
annoying one - "What if when I think flurble, I'm actually right ?".
None of which can be answered, and I'm not even bothering to think any
further than a single line beyond the question these days, thank god. But
the questions are there. Of course a lot of those questions relate to issues
in the past as they generally must with 'What if' questions, but there's
also the future tense version, like "What if flibble happens; what will I do
then ?". And there's even the extended disco version which can just leave
you trying to work out what the question even means once you've phrased it -
"What if buzz happens, and I said I'd bingle but I can't because of the
wobble I can't do that even though I promised ?"
Oh, it's not like I'm thinking about how the world might be if things were
different really; but more trying to reason what happened in the past.
Thinking about it, there's probably an equal number of "Why ?" questions
that I float around and are equally unanswered.
It's easier sometimes to just put all these questions in a big box and leave
them alone. Putting things in a box like that just means you have to come
back and open it at some point. Boxes never stay closed forever, it seems.
I was going to get up early today. My alarm went off and I was thinking I
ought to get up and then I didn't. And then it was 8am and it was a little
too late so I just went to sleep. Not the most thrilling of stories, I
realise, but I'm not exactly known for originality. Well, except on very rare
occassions.
One of the nice things about AMPlayer is being able to play tracks
concurrently. That is, I've got 3 tracks playing in the player at the
moment. Well, strictly not playing - 2 are paused and the 3rd is playing -
'cos obviously that'd just be noise. But it's kinda nice because it means
that whilst listening to one thing you can just pause that and start
something else playing immediately and when it finishes (or at any other
time) go back to exactly where you were in the earlier track. Or, as I've
done now, the machine came on playing 'The Police' and I fancied listening
to another track (because a line was going around my head earlier) by 'Rod
Stewart', and then whilst listening to that I wanted to quote the 'Arena'
track above and so put Solomon on as well. So, once Solomon finishes, I'll
restart 'Rod Stewart' (or not; maybe I won't feel like it then) and then go
back to to 'The Police'. Hey, it may not be the most obvious of things,
but when you've got a mildly non-linear thought process (which is a nicer way
of saying that my mind tends to jump a lot between unrelated things )
it's a real help.
Oh, and I tried to email Matthew Godbolt a few days ago and got back a
bounce, sadly. Anyone know where he is these days ? You know, I could just
ring the last number I have for him and see if he's still there.
Oh, and it appears I do have a copy of I don't want to talk about it , by
Everything But The Girl
- it's on one of the compilation albums. Julian mentioned it a few days ago
on his diary. Hmm. I'm not sure which one I prefer.
Hmm. And LyricsFreak have changed their page format so my parser didn't get
anywhere with it.
Ok,
The Police isn't quite the mood I need to be in right
now.
I had a little bit of a scary dream last night, too. Which I'm not going to
relate in public because its content was disturbing and personal anyhow.
I was just thinking; I could probably do that quite easily. I know quite a
few people use the RSS feed, but it wouldn't be hard to make the 'RSS feed
to email' conversion tool which could tell you when the page had updated.
Obviously I wouldn't be using the email addresses for anything other than
this RSS feed process, 'cos I'm not like that, but also it would mean you
saying to me "I want to know about your life" which isn't exactly everyone's
cup of tea, I imagine.
I managed to make a fool of myself a moment ago by ringing the wrong number
and getting a friend's Parents. Really easy to do when you don't make a note
of which number is which. But still, I feel foolish when it happens.
I also rang Adrian Lees to say congratulations on getting Aemulor working on
the A9. Which probably isn't all that special, but I thought it was quite a
nice thing to do. It impressed me that he got it working so quick anyhow.
You know, the way the album covers are done I could be really
clever and link direct to a local copy of the lyrics. Well, maybe that's not
'really' clever, but it'd be quite cute anyhow. You'd never have to search
for them elsewhere 'cos I'd have them already stored here. Or something.
Maybe.
Anyhow, I finally got through and spoke to Helen, and it was lovely to chat
again (hopefully not too depressing anyhow). It's strange; she said her mum
still asks after me. I really wouldn't have thought they'd remember me to be
perfectly honest. But nice, really. I'd not heard from her since she got
back from Poland, so I was just concerned that she was well. And I
apologised to her for being scary stalker-type person for a while.
I wasn't really all that bad I don't think, but I wasn't exactly... um...
sensible. Which I think covers most of the people I should apologise to -
certainly all of the girls I believe that I've wronged over time, I believe.
In any case, I feel a little better about myself for at least doing that.
Maybe I should make a list of the people I know I should have apologised to
and tick them off. That'd be... um... a little organised about saying sorry.
If you're saying sorry in an organised way, does that mean that you don't
mean it as much ? Hmm. I think it still means the same as it did
if you're saying sorry because you have wronged them,
rather than just to make the list seem worthwhile. And of course, if you do
really mean it.
And in continuing exciting news of the silly project I'm working on, the
string "Hello" appears to have a value of around 1E1000. Which probably
means that the code to recognise strings doesn't work.
Nope; it means that I'm not recognising 'NaN' ('Not a Number') properly.
Which is frustrating; I'll work that out properly tomorrow because simple
'is this NaN ?' isn't working, I'm not sure why and it's late and I don't
want to think about it.
Some days - and it's only rare days now, sadly - it's useful to be able
to remember how to talk HTTP direct to servers from telnet. Yeah, it
really isn't all that often.
I sometimes envy Caroline in being so 'together' with her life.
We had another mouse in today; after a little fun yesterday chasing a mouse
around the hall after Greebo brought him in, we've got another one tonight.
Again, Greebo bringing him in. He's evil, clearly. Even if he's just being a
cat. As I write this, he's sitting in a box in my room, just looking at the
'walls' around him and breathing hard. When he starts getting fidgity I'll
let him outside but for now he can stay here where it's not raining, there's
no cats and there's nothing for him to worry about. Except the huge,
bespectacled, human that keeps looking at him once in a while. There's
nowhere in here to stick the cam on him, so I didn't bother.
It's 1:30am and I'm thinking "what am I doing" to myself. I'm thinking I
should go to bed really, only... I'm not actually doing the going. It's like
the getting up in the morning. Which isn't fair, because I know the whole
point; it's just difficult to break a habit and to actually do what you say
and know you should. Some things are easy habits to break.
Oh, and I watched "Star Trek First Contact (1996)Action, Adventure, Sci-Fi, Thriller The time is the 24th century and the ship is the newly commissioned Enterprise-E. It's captain, Jean-Luc Picard, has been ordered not to interfere in a combat between a Borg Cube and ships from the Federation. However, seeing the Federation is about to lose, Picard ignore his orders and take command of the defending fleet. With his knowledge of the weak spot of the Cube, they destroy it. However, a small part of it escapes and plot a course directly to Earth. The Enterprise chases it and enters a time distortion created by the Borg. They end up in the mid 21st century, their only chance of stopping the Borg from assimilating Earth being to help Zefram Cochrane make his famous first faster than light travel to the stars...Star Trek First Contact"
again this afternoon, because I
didn't remember it. It's not too bad. I think I prefer Insurrection though.
I haven't seen the one that follows that whose name eludes me right now.
Wah! Someone said they didn't like the album images on my site. That's,
like, terrible. Oh well, you can't please everyone I guess. However, it's
possible to try. I think the person who said they didn't like them was
using NetSurf so I can't really help them, but for those of us that use
JavaScript capable browsers you should now have a little 'Hide albums'
link which appears beside the 'Hide sidebar' link. This setting will be
remembered by a cookie so you should get the same settings each time.
Because of the way in which the page is processed, the images will appear
momentarily before being hidden away once the page has loaded. But that's no
huge deal really. Possibly not the best use of 45 minutes but it's amused
me a little.
Aside from being relatively depressing, and dark, I really enjoy the Lacuna
Coil that I've got. Well, possible because of that, actually. So,
I'm thinking... what's my favourite track ? Maybe I should do this for a few
artists, 'cos it'd be fun. Over the next few days maybe.
- To Myself I Turned
- Falling Again
- Heaven's A Lie
- Cold Heritage
- Honeymoon Suite
Maybe I should do a quotes ordered by artist page as well as a quotes
ordered by date.
It's such a fun little song; although that's not really the section that's
the most fun - the section which is 'entre fotos y cuandernos, entre cosas y
recuerdos, eue no puedo comprender' in the chorus is just so pretty. I can't
help just laughing because it just runs so gorgeously together.
I wrote a couple of hours of code, and then ran a nice little program that
deleted the lot. That was really pleasing. Oh yes, I didn't half feel silly
for that. Anyhow, it only took another hour to re-write the program so it
wasn't too bad.
I'm sure there are some really poor lyrics out there, but Roxette's 'June
Afternoon' can compete with the rest of them I feel...
I mean, come on, people...
Oh, I don't expect anyone to agree with my musical taste .
And now I'm all annoyed because I can't find any music that I actually do
want to listen to. I got as far as track 11, with a few skips and then
decided I needed something else. So I'm back on 'In A Reverie'. I'm not
exactly exploring my music at the moment really.
I'm also annoyed because I couldn't (although have now) work out how to make
a JavaScript reflection of an arbitrary group of C structures. It just took
a little time and reading to get something that seems to be working.
On the plus side, I've just added 7.5 to 2.5 and got 10.0 so I must be doing
something right!
Last week's searches have, apparently, all been 'C' words - CMunge, Caroline
and Choices. Phil emailed to say that it wasn't him searching for
'Highschool', too.
Also, early this morning someone was searching for 'DrawGrade' which is
really amusing because it's been years since I wrote that. In fact, I don't
even know whether I have a copy left on my machine. Well, I probably do but
I have no idea where.
I was reading someone's online diary earlier as I was bored and there was a
typo - 'going in to shops and trying on cloths', as I recall - and it
brought a whole memory flooding back. I had this image of them walking in
and putting whole rolls of cloth against themselves to see how it looked...
and then realised that Caroline had done something similar. It was...
strange. I really hadn't remembered about that until now - not even
slightly. It's amazing the things that are buried down there.
I'm really quite jumpy now. Or maybe panicy. Not sure which it is. Could be
because someone was looking for Caroline in the diary. Or because of that
memory jumping back at me as if to taunt me about a past that I possibly
don't know.
Went to the bank today to pay in some cheques which was kinda normal. Except
it was raining and on the way back after being so very careful almost all
the way home I managed to stand on a snail. I hate that. I know it's
only a snail, but there he (or she) is, sliding along, having a nice time in
the rain, and then suddenly he's not. Without him even realising, a huge
foot has just snuffed him out. It's so unfair and thoughtless. And I feel
guilty for it. I always feel guilty, admittedly, but it's just one more
thing to add to the pile.
Uninteresting fact; I have around 180 tracks with the word 'guilt' in.
Which was mainly brought about because I wanted something else to quote
other than Crucify , from Little Earthquakes , by
Tori Amos
("Got enough guilt to start my own religion") because I probably quote it a
lot. It's another 'me' track, though. Ah the wonderous features of having
all your music so organised. Some might just say I was a little... um...
obsessive about it. Obsessive ? Me ?
I was going to write to William to say thank you for inviting us to his
naming ceremony, but I never have, and I feel a little guilty for that.
Mainly because I thought it would be cute; he and Jessica wrote to us after
the new year, so I thought it would be nice to write back. And speaking of
cute things, I realised a few days ago that a present I wanted to give
someone which should have been exceptionally cute and thoughtful is utterly
inappropriate. Whilst trying to be cute I kinda forgot the sanity; there's
being surprising and there's... well... just doing things wrong.
I'm not sure I'm keen on Sundays. They seem to be filled with... nothing.
I nearly feel angry. I would if I had the energy anyhow. Only, I've tried
so hard for so long not to feel angry that my heart isn't in it anyhow.
I'm working through a rather silly and possibly pointless project at the
moment. It's really just an experiment to see if I can do this; I don't
know whether it'll work but I'm going to try it. Probably I'll abandon
it like most other things, but we'll see anyhow.
Twice now I've had the Linux box just die with out of memory errors. The
first time, a few days ago, I thought nothing of it really because there
wasn't much I could do about it. This second time I was more annoyed - what
if I'd been doing something useful, or the system had become seriously
broken because of it. Anyhow, I took a look around whilst it's still in the
middle of complaining about a lack of memory and there's no swap space and
no real memory available for pretty much anything. And there are a lot of
'proxy-nntp' processes running.
The 'proxy-nntp' actually doesn't proxy NNTP, strictly. That was just why
I created it originally; the more common use of it is to provide certain
friends with a means of accessing my local HTTP server without my opening it
up to the whole world. The proxy provides a simple encryption algorithm
which uses a simple agreed key on connection (which should prevent replay
attacks, not that it's significant for this particular method). A couple of
people suggested I should just use SSH tunnelling, rather than this more
obscure thing, but... Well, it's not that I don't trust SSH, but
that it's out there, it's known and people will try to exploit any possible
hole that may be found - the gains on exploiting an SSH hole are potentially
huge - whereas only a few people know the (laughably simple, but still not
obvious) algorithm that my encrypted system uses - the gains on it would be
minimal by comparison. Yeah, it's a paranoia over such things, and it's
security through obscurity - it'll never be able to stop a serious attempt
to crack it - but it's not blindly open, and it's not a well-known protocol
so your average hacker will just go 'huh?' and move on to their next target.
In any case... the tool's written in perl, and it's forking whenever it gets
a connection because it just makes life easier - if I was doing it in C, I'd
be more clever about it, but it's not like it's an 'important' piece of code
(or so I thought). The problem, though, is that it never drops the connection
unless one of the ends that it's proxying for does, so the process remains
open forever whilst the connection remains present. And more importantly,
the memory remains in use for the newly forked process. So, someone
connecting to the right port and then just leaving the connection open
wasted (from looking at the statistics) about 1.6M (which is a silly big
amount for such a simple proxy, but that's what you get when you use perl).
And many of these connections eventually killed the machine.
All I've done is add a short timeout to the connection and transfer system
so that should anyone try to do that they will have to get all their
connections within a short space of time to cause a memory failure. That's
not the most ideal of things, but it will suffice for now. It should stop
random probing from leaking processes indefinitely by at least having
some limits on the processing.
Saturday today, which means that
Doctor Who (2005, BBC One)Action and Adventure/Science-FictionThe Doctor looks and seems human. He's handsome, witty, and could be mistaken for just another man in the street. But the Doctor is a Time Lord: a 900 year old alien with 2 hearts, part of a gifted civilization who mastered time travel. The Doctor saves planets for a living - more of a hobby actually, and he's very, very good at it. He's saved us from alien menaces and evil from before time began - but just who is he?Doctor Who's on again. Yay, a bright light
at the end of the day.
I'm trying, idly, to work out what the spoken section at 1:35 in 'The
Perfect Element' actually is. It's a group of voices - mirroring the voices
from the song teller's mind - but I just can't make out what they are. A few
lines and words I can just make out, but it's not the easiest of things.
![[Quote]](../images/quoteleft.gif) |
And sometimes you want to speak to her and then
You do not want to speak,
Then the opportunity has passed.
Your dreams flare up, they suddenly vanish.
[ Sometimes it happens; Brian Patten ]
|
![[Quote]](../images/quoteright.gif) |
It's annoying when, years later, you can appreciate things properly, when
they've been lost for so long.
I had a dream last night about ( ok, I've just realised why this is
odd) a track that was like Gabrielle's 'Dreams' but not that track actually.
It seemed odd and I don't listen to that track because... well, it's all
a little bit 'not me', but I tried listening to it and skimmed the biography
that was noted with it. A section caught my eye...
![[Quote]](../images/quoteleft.gif) |
The big break came when she recorded a demo called 'Dreams' based around
Tracy Chapman's 'Fast Car' which subsequently fell into the hands of an A&R
man at Go! Beat.
[ Dreams; Biography of Gabrielle ]
|
![[Quote]](../images/quoteright.gif) |
So, I think... Let's have a listen to 'Fast Car' and see what it's like. And
suddenly it's like "wow, I know this track". I'm not sure it was the one I
was thinking of in the dream but it's still memorable. The two tracks are
quite opposite in their feeling - 'Fast Car' is a story of disappointment,
whereas 'Dreams' is about hope - but clearly there's something similar in
them.
You could say it's not all that great to be going back to old albums
(
Tracy Chapman is 1988) but it's exploring things that I
wouldn't have otherwise listened to. Just because it's not recent doesn't
mean it's not 'new' to me so I think it's great to find this music that I've
not heard before. After all, there's a world of music that's gone before, so
can it would be foolish to just ignore all that history.
Hmm. I think I've lost my CD for Tubular Bells III , by
Mike Oldfield . I believe I
found that out a couple of years ago when I wanted to re-encode the MP3s at
a higher rate, but I still haven't got a new copy. One day, I guess.
I rebuilt pico and pilot using the latest sources today. Wow. Not entirely
useful, or practical really but what the hell, it's done. One day I'll work
out a list of the cack that I've done and never bothered to release. There's
just so many bits that are nearly finished and never will be.
It's 4am. I've just watched the last two episodes of
Joey (2004, NBC)ComedyFrom three of the executive producers behind the mega-successful hit series "Friends" comes the highly anticipated new comedy "Joey." Multiple Emmy, Golden Globe and SAG Award nominee Matt LeBlanc reprises his "Friends" role as charming and still-single Joey, who has struck out on his own and moved to Hollywood, hoping to truly make it as an actor.Joey says goodbye to a time when his friends were his family and welcomes the chance to turn his family into his friends. After reuniting with his high-strung sister Gina (Emmy winner Drea de Matteo, "The Sopranos"), a strong and sexy hairdresser, Joey moves in with her genius 20-year-old son, graduate student Michael (Paulo Costanzo, "Road Trip"), who literally is a rocket scientist. What Joey lacks in book smarts, however, he more than makes up for with his people skills, making him the best new friend his nephew could ask for.Joey. It's hardly
wonderful, but it has its amusing bits - I've put my time in to watch it, so
I'm going to see it through to the end. Anyhow that's done and I'm
absolutely fed up and I have no idea what to do now. I don't want to go to
bed because I'll just feel awful and I don't really feel like much else.
Oh, and Julian quoted a track that I wanted to quote last week - and
amusingly was on telly only last week. I actually wanted to quote it before
I noticed it was on, but saying that doesn't mean too much.
However, since I can't go to sleep I might as well do something useful with
my time and tick off something from my list. Well that's a sort of tentative
tick on the list. I'm not able to concentrate. My mind's just wandering too
much at the moment. Listening to 'Brave' probably doesn't help. Sleep.
Hopefully some of the RSS entries that ended up being 'empty' should now
come out correctly. The problem was that the elements which were 'special'
(in the most usual cases 'private' or 'songquote' entries) were just being
truncated as soon as they were reached. Oh, and I misspelt 'truncated' in a
variable name. I should really use perl with warnings on to catch such
things.
Yeah, I chose the
Jim Steinman version rather than the
Meat Loaf version even though it's the
Meat Loaf version that's got the stronger memories. Hmm. I
just tried listening to that version just then; it's apparently a little raw
again now. I think there's only a couple of people that know why it
important to me anyhow. Apart from the blindingly obvious, which
actually I hadn't really noticed until right now.
Dad and I watched "National Treasure (2004)Action, Adventure, Thriller Benjamin Franklin Gates descends from a family of treasure-seekers who've all hunted for the same thing: a war chest hidden by the Founding Fathers after the Revolutionary War. Ben's close to discovering its whereabouts, as is his competition, but the FBI is also hip to the hunt.National Treasure"
tonight. It was actually very fun. I
was expecting something interesting, but it was very 'Indiana Jones'-like.
![[Quote]](../images/quoteleft.gif) |
Being such a mess that your friends don't even ask for your help ?
That's the bottom of the barrel.
[ A Mess; Scrubs ]
|
![[Quote]](../images/quoteright.gif) |
Angela rang today; it was lovely to talk to her again after so long. She's
very settled, it seems, which is lovely to hear. I at least apologised to
her for any past... um... nasties. She doesn't remember anything, but in any
case I've done it.
One of the commonly known truths was explored today. Pouring water over the
electrical connection, rather than into a kettle will kill the power in the
house. The UPS kept the computers running, but the cordless phone stopped
(obviously) as did everything, and this little voice called upstairs to me
"Um, that may have been me". So remember this... don't pour water over the
connections to your kettle. A pretty obvious and self-explanatory piece of
advice.
And I managed to pop a button off my shirt whilst I was gesturing and
talking on the Talker so I had to sew it back on. Golly thrilling, huh ?
Oh yes and I got a nice card from Essex uni asking me to donate money and a
card from the nice man - Paul Sullivan - who I spoke to on the phone. Not
quite at the moment, I think, but it was nice to chat to him. He was even in
Eddington flat 9 in first year. Strange world.
Practically, though, today seems to have been a bit of a loss. Oh well.
So, what's been achieved today. Well, I fixed Julian's CD player. I only
said I'd look at it about 3 years ago, so that's quite quick for me. But
it's hardware. And it's using a soldering iron - the right way around this
time. Ok, so it's only making sure that the connections are all made
properly, but still I feel it's useful. Maybe not in the grand scheme of
things, but nonetheless it makes me feel like I'm not so useless.
Simon said that he didn't like the track because it's mathematically wrong.
After a little pondering (yeah, I was slow) I said that it is correct.
1 AND 1 = 1. Yeah, I think I'm a bit sad.
I love Innocent Eyes , by
Delta Goodrem because it's
so... pianoy. And
Delta Goodrem has a
gorgeous voice. And it's a cute track too. Really I should try to follow the
things that I like. Long ago it was the case that I thought I didn't like
most female artists, and then I realised that most of what I listen to these
days is female singers. Not all, probably actually only 60% female maybe, but
still it's a lot more than 'don't like' . And when it comes to tracks
that are just cute it's usually the 'tinkly' or 'pianoy' bits that are tend
to grab me. Off the top of my head, pianoy things like Winter , by
Tori Amos , Solomon , by
Arena , and The Burgundy Rose , by
Clive Nolan and Oliver Wakeman
spring to mind.
I've just realised that 'Hooded Claw' should be capitalised, because it's a
noun. Huh. It's amusing to have a reference to Penelope Pitstop in a love song
like that .
Yeah, I want to change those words around a little, but that's the lyric.
That's the problem with lyrics sung by one gender directed at another.
Yes, I've got kinda carried away doing little lyrics because I know it'll
put pictures with them. That's a little bit cheating. But still they're
things I was listening to so it's not like it's cheating that much.
I've now seen the first episode of
Dead Like Me (2003, Showtime)Comedy/Drama/Fantasy18-year-old George Lass (Ellen Muth) dies when a toilet from the MIR space station falls from the sky and hits her. Upon her death she discovers that she has been slated to become a reaper, a figure who removes souls from others just before death to ease them into thier individual afterlives. Rube (Mandy Patinkin), her new boss in the afterlife introduces her to fellow reapers Roxy (Jasmine Guy), Mason (Callum Blue), and Betty (Rebecca Gayheart). In addition to reaping George discovers she must find a way to support herself in the afterlife and takes a job at a temp agency working for Delores Herbig (Christine Willes) where she had worked at the time of her death. The series also follows the continuing drama of how George's family is dealing with her death as she follows the lives of her mother Joy (Cynthia Stevenson), father Clancy (Greg Kean) and sister Reggie (Britt McKillip).Dead Like Me. It's... well, it's a
black humour thing and I think I would enjoy it. Only... it's just that I
find it very sad at the moment. Maybe I'll watch it some other time and I'll
feel better about it.
I actually admire Ian for managing to be so dedicated to what he does. Even
when he's so frustrated. It's frustrating at times, but it's a good trait.
My mind is playing its conspiracy theory game at the moment. It's really
quite insane the things it cooks up with nearly no evidence. Oh well. I can
put two and two together and get oranges.
Here we go; this is an odd one I found whilst wandering the
Doctor Who (2005, BBC One)Action and Adventure/Science-FictionThe Doctor looks and seems human. He's handsome, witty, and could be mistaken for just another man in the street. But the Doctor is a Time Lord: a 900 year old alien with 2 hearts, part of a gifted civilization who mastered time travel. The Doctor saves planets for a living - more of a hobby actually, and he's very, very good at it. He's saved us from alien menaces and evil from before time began - but just who is he?Doctor Who
sites. The BBC Doctor Who
site currently has a set of multiple 'tv screen' images that
cycle pictures and links. Image three-across, two-down changes to a Welcome To Geocomtex image that you
can click on. From there, the 'Support' button lists a few technical
questions. Some are silly; some I don't get. The first however, is
![[Quote]](../images/quoteleft.gif) |
I've got a brand new RH-390 S12. The pins aren't properly set.
Whoops! Our mistake. There was a transposition when the manual was
printed. The correct sequence is:
-... .- -.. .-- --- .-.. ..-.
[ Geocomtex support ]
|
![[Quote]](../images/quoteright.gif) |
Which if we refer to a
Morse Code Table
spells out 'BAD WOLF'.
And the Who Is
Doctor Who site now includes a letter from a young 'Adam
Mitchell' who's won a 'geocomtex' competition with his letter about
getting technology from aliens. And I think the 'wedding video' bits at
the top of the page are previews of the next episode, "Doctor Who1x08 "Father"Location: London, Earth Date: 1986 Enemy: The Reapers Rose requests a trip back to the day her father, Pete Tyler, died. Reluctantly, the Doctor agrees, but he realises he has made a mistake, when Rose saves Pete from being run over by a car. This has now changed the timeline, and Reapers are transposing themselves all over the Universe. However, this time, the Doctor doesn't have a plan…Father".
Looks like the site has actually been kept up to date, which is cute.
Oh, and the UNIT website
exists and accepts passwords 'bison' (for information about events,
including the discovery and auction of the Dalek) and 'buffalo' (the
Doctor's password).
FreeFind tells me that someone went mad searching for Caroline 9 times on
Wednesday last week. Well, there are one or two entries about her in the
diary.. And there was a search once later for 'highschool'; so that could
have been Phil or someone else I knew from school, I guess. Not that it
matters. For all I know it could have been anyone else wanting to know about
her. Which, in itself might be quite wrong. Hmm.
I've been relatively circumspect about saying things that would otherwise
give away private details but I think I've kept all the personal details
hidden. She'd have said if I'd not. Well, she probably would have. That is,
if she even looked at it. On the other hand, you never know, if could be
Andrew, or their families checking up on the psycho that still writes about
her. Hmm. That, too, isn't exactly an appealing notion. And you might argue
'don't write about her if you don't want to be thought of like that'. Which
is a fair and reasonable point.
In last night's dream, Andrew was suggesting I not wear yellow socks. I
never wear yellow socks. I don't know why he was suggesting that, but it's
pretty good advice I think. I may, however, have been wearing yellow socks
in the dream. I don't remember.
A few people (well 3) have said they like the little album cover graphics so
far. Which is a little interesting. Oh, and whilst I remember, the italic
text for the song quote is an idea that I stole from Julian's diary 'cos it
seemed to look nice.
And I apologised to Andrew Rawnsley today for being an arse. Well, a lot of
things might have been handled better back then. I really ought to apologise
to Matthew too. I've lost touch with him, though. And maybe Alistair for not
keeping in touch with him, too.
William's naming ceremony today, which was really nice. Got to meet a few of
our family that we never see often enough. Jessica, as usual, was gorgeous -
and of course Lucy was too (yes, I have to say that to ensure that I don't
offend her by not mentioning it after all). Martin wasn't wearing his
brightly coloured tops, though, which was a little sad. Well, maybe not sad,
but it's always 'him'. He just gives off 'happy' when he wears the bright
tops . That said, he still had 'happy' today, so maybe it's not the
tops that makes that happiness come out .
Whilst at the reception Hannah, Simon and I were saying about how people
should have name badges on, or - better still - their name and their place
in the family tree . Yeah, we suck at remembering these things. I have
a reasonable(ish) memory for faces, so recognise people even if I can't name
them. Whilst scanning the reception I saw loads of the family who I couldn't
even have named given the chance, but one face stuck out as being wrong. It
was a face I knew, but it wasn't in the right place. Later, I went inside
and passed them and they said 'hello' and I said 'hello' back, thinking "I'm
sure that's Paul". I thought "hey, I could ring them and see if they answer
the phone... only my mobile's got no battery left". And finally thought "am
I actually changing or just being myself as I've always been" and went up to
talk to him for a change. Which was a really good move as I was right and it
was indeed Paul Skirrow. And whilst I'm avoiding RISC OS things in general,
it was still nice to see him as he was quite nice to me when I was at Pace.
But so strange to find that he knew Lucy and Martin.
Someone said about the diary 'When you start quoting from "Sorrow" or
"Wearing The Inside Out" then I'll begin to worry... Appreciate your
diary.' today.
Which is odd, because I thought I had quoted 'Sorrow' recently.
Checking back, it hasn't been quoted, which is curious as it's certainly a
track which should be quoted in any case. I think maybe I didn't bother
because it was already quoted back
in 2002. And for a similar reason, oddly enough.
I can, however, tell you that 'Sorrow' has been played 6 times on the RiscPC
since 22 March 2005. Which isn't all that interesting, but it's apparently
true. Well, 7 now, 'cos I've just put it on. I try not to quote the same thing
too often because... well, it's a bit dull, even for me .
There are quite a few tracks listed in the songquote blocks that don't have
an album listed beside them. I should probably try to correct that. Most of
them are now corrected to have the correct album associated with the quote
where it's known.
I've updated the 'songquote' style to incorporate the album cover, where
applicable. This is a quite experimental thing so I might change my mind
in the future. It's probably not actually all that sensible an idea really
but I'm just playing with it to see whether it seems useful or not.
See earlier entries for examples.
Went to Center Parcs with Mum, Simon, Hannah and Julian.
Sometimes you just wish you thought of things. Someone's done a "Last
Dalek's secret
diary".
I made a cheap iPod
today, too.
I find it 'amusing' that the only hit on google for the phase that uses the
worlds 'tableside' and 'torture' together (yes, I'm avoiding putting them
together so that I don't change the results) is my Diary . Yeah, that
was an odd dream. I do actually remember it.
Whee, I voted today. First time for me; after all this time I'd never voted
- it's amazing but I'm finally doing it. Not like it's particularly painful
anyhow.
Sid Meier's 'Pirates' can waste a lot of time. I must not play.
I spent a few minutes today - well about half an hour really - making the
archived diary entries (ie those that aren't the main page) include a
'title' element to describe them. Basically this just means that they
(should) provide additional tooltip (or similar) help when floated over.
Because of the way that the diary is constructed, you don't get these on the
main page, but they do appear on all the earlier entries. Internet Explorer
and Opera (7.5 and 8 at least) appear to display these as tooltips. It's
not particularly impressive, but it's a thing on my tick list.
Ok, not an important thing on the tick list, but it's there anyhow.
Simon's answered some more quizes now. He's less Trek than me, and equally
knowledgeable about countries.
The WebCam page is a little different
now. In theory I've fixed the auto-refresh problems with Oregano, the
centring problem with Opera and bumped the size up to 640x480. At night it
does tend to be a bit grainy because of the lack of light, but during the
day with the window open it's much better. And the camera itself is now
sitting in front of Pudsey, looking out over the whole room, rather than
just past me at a wall. Hopefully you get to see the door then which means
that if anyone ever comes in you see them. Astounding, huh ?
I don't usually post links back to other logs, but David Chess is an
exception in general because he manages to be insightful, honest and
intelligent (as well as funny at times ). So, with respect to 'How
to write a successful blog', he offers a very familiar viewpoint.
Which incidentally reminds me that I could do with 'permanent links' from
the 'current' month as otherwise you have to update your links after the
month passes.
In any case, I'll summarise by saying "everything's unimportant except
'clarity, proofreading, and RSS'". The first two are true of writing in
general, and the latter is just how you publish these days. So whilst I've
given more readership to that particular article, I hope it's reinforcing
David (and my) view that it's because 'it's cack'.
Julian,
Hannah,
Simon,
and
Chris
have done some test things, so I thought I'd compare.
Trek:
Justin: 57%
Julian: 44%
Simon: 52%
Brain:
Justin: 60% interpersonal, 80% visual, 80% verbal, 180% maths
Julian: 80% interpersonal, 20% visual, 120% verbal, 180% maths
Simon: 20% interpersonal, 100% visual, 100% verbal, 180% maths
Hannah: 80% interpersonal, 100% visual, 120% verbal, 100% maths
Capitals of the world:
Justin: 66%
Julian: 70%
Simon: 66%
History:
Justin: 40%
Commonly confused words:
Justin: 92% Beginner, 100% Intermediate, 100% Advanced, 66% Expert
Julian: 92% Beginner, 100% Intermediate, 100% Advanced, 93% Expert
Worst Case Scenarios:
Justin: 70% survival, 0% certain death
Julian: 67% survival, 0% certain death
Innocence:
Justin: -10 out of 56 (yeah, I had to include that for the cool result)
Julian: -25 out of 56
Hannah: -2 out of 56
Chris: -5 out of 56
I'll update them if the others do any more, but for now some quick comments...
I'm surprised I scored so highly on the History one - I was expecting around
20% after seeing the questions. I'm a little frustrated by the words one
though - I should be getting 100% on the beginner really. On the plus side, I
now understand the difference between some words I didn't really know before.
I was also surprised by the high Countries score - either Julian should have
got more than he did, or I should have got a lot less.
The Brain one was interesting; basically either we don't know ourselves very
well or the 'interpersonal' group is just rubbish. Simon should score
highest, Julian second and me last. The maths result is amusing, though -
that we all hit exactly the same mark.
Helen was at Auschwitz today.
I tried playing HalfLife 2 Demo today, too. With a little fiddling it
managed to work. It's very atmospheric. It really is in a different league
to Half Life, I think. I haven't really followed First Person games to be
honest, but the years have really been used effectively to make things much
more impressive. I'm not convinced by the implementation of picking things
up, though. The characters are impressive though. It was scary to see the
Zombies throwing the boxes and tables that were lying around at me, though.
I wasn't expecting that at all. Or the head crabs dropping off when you
shot them. However, I really shouldn't play games. It doesn't help achieve
my goal really. Much as the quizes don't either.
Well, my good feeling from yesterday has, as expected, evaporated with the
coming of a new day. In some ways it might be easier just to say what I
think and 'get the hell out of Dodge' - and I even checked that that was a
real phrase and hadn't just made it up. The only problem with saying what I
think is that it's probably wrong, probably results in more harm than good,
and probably isn't my place to say - even though I was explicitly asked.
Ah well.
On the plus side, today's Tips For Good Business Sense comes from Barclay's.
I'll summarise because I can't be bothered to go in to details. When you ask
for details from a customer on a website, try at the very least to validate
them. Don't just blindly continue as if they entered everything perfectly
when you know the details can't possibly be correct. If they stuck a space
in a number without realising then try taking it out, or at least tell them
that they made a mistake. There's a difference between preventing attacks
by informing people of invalid combinations and informing customers that
they're entering things that can't possibly be valid. For example, if I
enter 'george' as a membership number, it would be advisable to tell them
that it's not correct. What do you give away by doing that ? Absolutely
nothing; anyone who was intent on attacking would never do it. In
my case it was the membership number - read out as three groups of four
digits, in a similar manner to the numbers on your bank cards. So that's how
I entered it, with a space between each of the components. If someone enters
'2010 1234 1234' then surely it would save a lot of time and energy to just
strip the spaces ? Or at worst, return them to a page that says that it
contains invalid characters and should consist only of numbers. Yeah, maybe
I'm dim, but there's probably quite a lot of dim people out there. Do you
really think it's a good use of people's time to be solving that sort of
problem ?
I started working on the rather naff 'generate a webpage listing every track
played' program today too. It was another of those 'show that I'm not quite
useless' things.
I think I may have an idea what the something is that I need. I spent a
little while talking to mum and she said some things that were helpful.
Maybe I am not quite as crazy as I thought I was. I think my first instincts
were right. I just need to be able to focus and follow through. Mum wasn't
really saying anything that I didn't already know, and it's not all that
wonderful to hear your whole life being criticised, but she (and I) was
right. So let's see if we can actually follow through on doing something
about things.
Well, I wrote some code today. And it worked. Startling, huh ? But I was
quite chuffed that it worked and I felt quite good about it for a bit. I
generally feel a little better today though. I think because I understand
things better now and I've come to the sort of "this is the answer" point.
Or at the least, the point at which I can say "there's nothing else I can
put together without making assumptions". Of course, I don't actually
have any answer. What I do have, though, is the problem
which is much more important and allows you to determine the answer.
And of course, knowing the problem only begs more questions, but at least
they're questions that I can ask. Or might ask. Or would ask if given the
opportunity. Or something like that. Not that I have any right to. More
than likely it'll be years before I would, and it won't matter then, so
nothing will come of them. So I'll just shut up.
Today has just been too hot really. Lovely storm last night. Or there
probably was. I remember seeing flashes of it, and kind of hearing the rain,
and being just about awake enough to see if the cats were out. But for a
change my head was just racing and managed to drown out the outside. Odd
that.
Sigh. And now I feel pathetic again. I still need something and I don't know
what it is.
|
Disclaimer: By submitting comments through this form you are implicitly agreeing to allow its reproduction in the diary. I say this not because I'm going to ruthlessly attack comments in the diary, but just so that nobody can say "Well, I didn't say you could quote me on that".