The phrase "Why the freakin'-fuck's that enabled ?" doesn't get uttered too
often by me.
I was curious as to whether the XP DNS server responds with a HINFO record
for itself. It doesn't appear to, but in looking for it, I also tried
'*Host -s laptop-wire localhost' which gave me the somewhat
odd answer of 'Aliases: localhost loghost wibbley'. Maybe I set
'Wibbley', but I don't think so - I wouldn't have included an 'e' in it.
So I tried to find where that 'wibbley' came from, or what I could use to
configure it. I couldn't on my first few searches find anything useful at
all. Eventually I remembered that 'lmhost' is used as a file to describe the
LanMan hosts on the network where no name service is in use (these days,
hosts defend their own names, and they're announced regularly in the absence
of a central server to maintain those names), and searched for that. That
gave me the 'Windows/system32/drivers/etc' directory that I don't remember
seeing before. And 'Wibbley' isn't in there.
But there is a 'quotes' file. So I began to wonder if there was a QOTD
('Quote Of The Day') server on XP. It wouldn't make much sense because it's
a little bit pointless and really has little reason to be part of the OS -
and if it were, it wouldn't be on by default, would it ? It would be an
amazingly pointless service to leave enabled. Fun, but pointless. So I try
'telnet laptop-wire qotd' and up pops a quote from George Bernard Shaw.
It is at this point that I utter the above words.
I'm looking through the Services on the system and I can't see any QOTD (or
anything similar) running as a service. It's possible that I installed it
without thinking by just selecting 'everything'. That was really because I
can't be bothered with the 'hunt out the CD' at some later date. Obviously
that's a dim thing to do because if you install it, that means you want it
running - 'Simple TCP/IP services' in the Windows components list.
So it's me being dim, but still. It would be nice to actually have a
configuration option for it; rather than just 'it's installed' or 'it's
not'.
It appears that I've been spelling Counting Crows' "Sullivan Street" wrongly
for ages. And also "Frankie Goes To Hollywood" too.
God NTL are being shite tonight. So far it's been 25 minutes and it's not yet
got a connection to the net. It's 5am now and I'm probably not going to even
bother thinking about it because I'm going to bed in a bit, but still it's
getting back to 'never getting connected'. Remind me again why I stick with
them ? Oh yeah, I'm lazy.
Damn. That said, I wanted to download the correct lyrics for 'Welcome To The
Pleasuredome', so I've got to have a connection for that. Bloody annoying.
Of course, I think "Shall I check in ntl.announce" to see if they've got any
work planned for this morning. And then I have to laugh at myself for being
so stupid. Of course there isn't any posting of maintenance. They haven't
posted anything to ntl.announce which is of any use for about 2 years.
So I try freenetnames, which I haven't dialled into for ages, mostly because
there's very litle point as I don't have the account for 'movspclr'. And get
a connection first go and everything just works.
Apparently I've got a reasonable amount of email at the 'movspclr' account.
I expect 99.9% to be spam.
I finally updated my CoverFetcher tool to fetch lyrics. It's not so hard,
really, when you think about it. Covers are bigger than lyrics, fortunately,
so a lyric fetch will consume less bandwidth overall. And the principle is
the same, only you have to traverse an extra layer of objects in the
directory structure to decide what to fetch.
Fortunately the design of CoverFetcher means that a new set of scripts for
fetching from a generic batch of sites is quite easy to add. I expect I'll
probably do a few sites with the lyric style of fetching so that it's not a
load on any particular site. That said, I'm on dial-up - it's not like I can
sap their bandwidth to a crippling level really. Well, unless they're on
dial-up too. And in any case, my script's less invasive, bandwidth-wise,
than 'wget -r' so it's hardly anything special when it comes to fetching
things from a site.
All this said, songmeanings has now stopped accepting HTTP connections,
although the machine itself is still alive - it's still pingable and
accepting ssh connections, so I would imagine that they're doing some work
on it.
I 'discovered' SongMeanings
today. When I say 'discovered', I mean that I finally decided to pay some
attention to it rather than just using it for lyrics when I needed to
remember them. So I signed up for an 'account' and I've left one comment so
far - for 'To Myself I turned'. It's a wonderful, introverted track and is
so 'me' .
It seemed odd to me that my view on the track differs slightly from the other
commentators at the site. I think really, though, that I'm taking it in a
slightly different way because I treat the whole 'In a reverie' album as a
single continuous theme and progression in time. It works as a concept like
that, so it feels comfortable that I should treat it that way. Anyhow, I
tried to place it in context with the preceeding and following tracks, which
doesn't help me much because it actually highlighted a possible reading that
I hadn't considered. Anyhow, I have an account and I might even do some
other postings if I remember or can be bothered.
It's difficult to read anything much into the site in places, though. There
are some tracks that have a reasonable degree of meaningful discussion (q.v.
Counting Crows' "A Murder Of One") and there are others that deserve a
meaningful discussion that have only 'this is great' (q.v Beth Orton's
"Stolen Car"). Maybe it's just that the 'meaning' is so obvious that the
posters see no reason to explain it. Or, like me, just pass by rather than
make some comment. Maybe I will tomorrow. I can put it off.
Ok, today's Galactica was interesting. Interesting to see how amazingly dull
they could manage to make an episode. Basically take the episode 'Drumhead'
from 'Star Trek: TNG' and remove any sense of actual purpose. 'Drumhead' was
a poor episode anyhow, and it's not made any better for Galactica.
Having now had a reasonable number of episodes, I think it's fair to start
to draw some proper thoughts about the series. Now it's difficult because
I remember the original series fondly because it was so long ago and it was
whilst I was young (obviously). So if a critique can be levelled at the
original series as well, then that's just the way it's going to be.
The series appears to be focusing on the whole 'there's a cylon amongst us'
thing. Side-theme are things like the fact that they're actually on the run
from the cylons (although that's really a middle-theme rather than side),
they're the last people left of the civilisation, and that they're trying to
stay alive. It's good to see the civilian government represented in the
programme, although it's 'unified' government with no distinction and no
representation from the other colonies doesn't seem realistic - much as I
like the president, her advisors appear to be Adama/Apollo for military,
Baltar for science, and her aide for just about everything else. She never
seems to consult with anyone else and it doesn't seem so much a democracy
(although they are on the run for their lives) as a military supported
dictatorship.
So you might argue that the 'science' part of this through Baltar is
intended to focus on the uncovering of the Cylons within the fleet - a focus
that I'm not that interested in. And being a show about the 'battlestar' you
might argue that it's got to have a military focus. But we've had precious
little in the way of action after the pilot, to be honest - and the fight
scenes aren't worth watching anyhow because of the poor filming style.
There's been very little consultation on matters of - for example -
overcrowding on ships that were never designed for deep space missions, of
food rationing, of entertainment (hell, you've got 50,000 people out there,
you desperately need to keep morale up), of health issues, of maintenance
and support (outside of the Viper hangars), not to mention rudimentary
problems like dispute resolution (you've got 50,000 people crammed into
ships together; you've going to have problems - ok, so there was the prison
ship episode which was actually worthwhile and I rather liked and not just
because of who was in it). We did see some of the organised family searches
that were going on in an earlier episode, so obviously there are some things
like that going on, but it's not represented within the fleet.
I would like to jump back to tonights episode for a real inconsistency (to
my mind)... I've already talked about the disperate use of technology -
Faster Than Light ships, but only nuclear weapons (another thing occurs
here; surely a biological agent, within the enclosed environment of a ship,
with recycled air would be more effective - particularly coming from a race
which is artificial) in use against one another - but during the press
conference (which was weird - you've got a load of reporters, some with boom
microphones and all competing with one another... wouldn't you have divided
these to the ships they came from and have representatives report, as well
as having only a single recorded version that was distributed ? you wouldn't
have effectively different networks vying for attention, would you ?) it was
broadcast around the fleet. For reasons that escape me, the crew were
picking the conference up on radios that come from the 1960s. And this is on
the Galactica too - we don't get to see what the 'people' think of this -
which (one presumes) has its own PA system which would have been much better
used for this announcement to ensure that everyone got the same information
and nobody was relying on hearsay.
Anyhow, back to the whole series. Am I being too harsh ? And is the belief
that I am being too harsh keeping me watching it ? Possibly. Another
influence to keep me watching it is that I've already expended energy on it
and I don't want to think that was a waste so I keep watching. Still another
is telling me that I should like it because... well, it's Galactica. And
another is telling me it's Sci-fi so I should at least give it a go.
The problem is that it's not Sci-fi. On earth there's a massive disaster
(let's say an organisation releases a biological toxin that kills people)
and most of the population is wiped out. All that's left are those few
people who band together to try to survive and find somewhere say to live.
Thwarting them is a group that caused the disaster and who is trying to kill
off the last remaining people. And in the 'good guys' there are a few people
who we know are really 'bad guys'. It's just... it's not got a hook. There's
this whole big deal about the cylons looking like people... well, that's no
different to 'people' looking like 'people'. There's the weaponry being so
utterly pathetic compared to the seeming advancement of the people that it
might as well be set in the modern day. There's the whole
Baltar-being-insane-or-being-a-cylon-or--oh-who-gives-a-damn pointless
story.
At this point I want to attack the original series. The weaponry was sucky
there too, but it was sucky in a way that didn't even try to pander with the
whole 'they've got nukes' thing.
I guess what I'm trying to say is that it feels like a bunch of persecuted
'right' people being attacked by an unjustified people and focuses more on
their troubles than on the fact that they should be running for their lives.
What I'm trying not to say is that it's a series for a bunch of restless
Americans who are trying to make it seem real by giving issues that can be
identified from a current standpoint - hey, look there could be a terrorist
amongst us; they could inflict any form of damage any time; and they can be
cleverer than we are.
Ok, I know as I'm writing it that it's not a good argument, but even
discounting that, the remainder of the series shows little in the way of
redeeming features for my continuing to watch it.
I don't jump to critique StarGate, or the Star Trek series' (ok, I do
critique Star Trek, but not to this extent). Why not ? After all, StarGate
is based more easily in the 'modern' world, and Star Trek series' are
intended to be part of the development of the world, so both should be open
to more critique. Maybe it's because they don't try to make
themselves fit to expectations (Star Trek less so). Andromeda is Star Trek
far advanced and I wouldn't even consider critiquing it because it's not
meant to be taken as 'seriously' as the others - it's not worth the effort
in criticising because it's just fun.
I think that with Galactica I feel I ought to critique it because it's got
more expectation behind it and a much more fond feeling about the original
version.
And so, after bitching about it for a screenful (again!), can I really bring
myself to watch the next episode ? I'm not sure. I may read the summary of
what the episode is and see whether I think it's worth it. And if it isn't,
I won't bother. Obviously.
Fortunately, bleb has a
week's worth of listings available, so Monday's episode is listed...
"Baltar is dumbfounded when Number Six appears on the ship posing as someone
else, but his surprise turns to distress when she accuses him of being the
traitor."
I'd like to say that I'm torn between wanting to know how Baltar gets out of
such a predicament and not giving a damn because it's the whole Baltar
story-line that I couldn't give a damn about now. Except I can't say that
because when I read it I just thought "well that's it then, I'm not going to
watch that". And I'm not all that sad.
Of course, when it gets to Thursday next week I may change my mind and watch
it anyhow. I do expect to come away thinking that I've wasted an hour, if I
do.
Ok, so tonight was Maya's attempt's on Dev and Sunnita's lives in their flat
in Coronation Street. Briefly, in case I forget, Maya's crazy solicitor
woman who Dev was engaged to and tried to help be more balanced before
finally breaking it off with her to get engaged to Sunnita. Maya spoilt
their engagement party, then went on to pretend to be Sunnita and get
married to a number of immigrants before finally ensuring that they Dev and
Sunnita were 'caught' by the police on their wedding day. Having finally got
Sunnita from prison when Maya was found to have set it up, they were all
happy and finally settled together with her family and then the call came in
that one of Dev's shops' alarms was going off. That was Monday.
There followed Dev's racing to the shop to arrive just in time for it to
explode (rather impressively, actually). Recovering from that, he hears that
another shop alarm is going off and tells the family above it to leave now,
and starts driving there. On arriving there, he hears that another one is on
fire and heads to it. Whilst on route, a shopkeeper living near to another
shop rings to say that his shop alarm is going off and moments later we hear
it too explode. Dev's expression as his business literally goes up in flames
was very amusing. Hey, add in Bruce Willis and you've got an action movie.
Anyhow, that was Monday. Today Sunnita and Dev are tied up in their flat
over the last of their corner shops, with Maya explaining how wrong Dev was
for dumping her - well you've got to have your 'evil speech' section,
haven't you ? So she turns on the gas cooker and takes off the knobs so they
can't get it off again and leaves them there with the cooker pouring gas out
and then goes down to the shop and lights a fire before leaving to go to her
car.
Exciting ? A bit, yeah. So we've got a few people up and about in the
morning and someone spots the smoke coming from the shop and starts getting
people out of their houses whilst a couple break in to the flat to get Dev
and Sunnita out. Dev gets dragged out - he's still hand cuffed but he's out,
and Maya, just pulls by and sees that he's out. Obviously she's pissed but
then the shop explodes and she thinks that Sunnita's upstairs in the flat,
and she starts to smile. Except that she's been got out and she's in front
of the shop with everyone else, safe with Dev. Drama ? Could be.
So, very pissed now, Maya drives at them - she's going to finish them off -
except they move (well wouldn't you if there's a car coming at you), and she
drives into a building. But then we see that she's ok and she starts to back
out again... Only to have a lorry from nowhere drive into the back of her,
ramming the car into another wall.
Up to then they were doing fine. Unfortunately that last touch was more of
Wilie Coyote class than anything else. Seriously. You know that bit where
Wilie thinks that he's safe and that he's not going to be flattened by
whatever inane plan he's put together... and then he does ? Well, it just
felt like that. Good bit of drama, but do you have to really have the
cartoon humour at the end ?
I gave someone at Kraft Foods a little bit of a laugh today. The
conversation on the talker drifted, as it does, from Coding Standards to
Chocolate Oranges. Actually that's not that hard... "What's a segment ?"
"Things you get in Chocolate Oranges" "With Chocolate Pips". At which point
I thought it'd be interesting to know why they don't make little chocolate
pips in the oranges.
So off I went to the Kraft webpage and got their phone number and began
ringing. By this time, Chris had suggested it was so that you don't plant
them and thus grow your own chocolate orange trees. So when I got through to
the customer service lady (which was very quick and she was very nice), I
explained this to her. She was amused at the idea but explained that there
was no need to make the pips as well.
Anyhow, that's the amusing story of the day. And thanks to Joseph, Alex, Ian
and Chris for providing the inspiration for it .
I was watching Star Trek TNG this afternoon, whilst doing some research on
the laptop downstairs (which is still quite fun), and the episode was 'The
Royale'. As they go to the desk, I noticed that the guy behind it looks
startlingly like Holland Manners on Angel. And what do you know... it is
him. Coo. And he was in The West Wing's 'Shibboleth' episode, too.
Speaking of which, Ainsley Hayes in The West Wing was in Friends, in The One
With The Breast Milk, as one of the girls that Joey worked with at the
department store selling cologne.
Today I've built up a big library. Built that is, but not made work. Now all
I need to do is build the clients to use it. And write a pthreads
implementation. And work it into a RISC OS interface that's actually usable.
Like that's going to happen easily. Might just give up on it, 'cos
it's a whole lot of work for little gain.
Well, it looks like a minor cock up on my part left me without email or a
website yesterday and the day before. Basically I got a new card, began
using it and forgot to update the details on the website provider. Managed
to do everyone else. Anyhow, it's up and running now which is good.
Most of the day has been taken up with updating the laptop. I bought a
larger disc for it, partly because the 20G disc was feeling a little
stifling but mainly because it was giving me CRC errors, which I'm pretty
sure isn't a good sign . Fortunately I lost nothing of consequence,
and now I have a 40G disc in there. We'll see how that goes. It's actually
been relatively painless changing everything over. It's a little annoying
that things like the Opera settings are such a pain to copy over and more
than a little annoying that the file and settings transfer wizard isn't
as complete as you might like. But nonetheless, I've got most things over
now.
The most fun bit was finding most of the USB kit and plugging it in so that
the system could identify it and then install the drivers. Not that I will
need most of the USB bits, but it saves me having to worry whether I've got
the driver disc, or more to the point where I left it.
The room now looks a mess because there's bits of things that I've been
trying to make do things. I'll tidy tomorrow. It's not like it's that much,
but I'm not in the mood for it right now.
Quick entry tonight 'cos I'm too tired to write anything more useful. Back
from Claire and Justin's now, which was rather a fun little break from
having to do anything at all - thanks . Last night, on coming back, we
went to a concert; 'Think Floyd', a Pink Floyd tribute band, in Kings Lynn.
Rather cool actually - although I've not been to the 'real thing' to compare
against.
And finally HDA on the linux box decided to play silly buggers today and
needed extreme fscking. Which is fine, except that I was left without
certain files that were needed to... well, do pretty much anything network
related - even sysklogd wouldn't start so I had to fight past console spam
just to do anything. Fortunately, CMJ managed to point me in the correct
direction and I now have a working disc again. A few files will need
restoring from backups, but on the whole it seems to have survived. Still,
it was a good way to waste about 4 hours .
I'm away at Claire's for a week, so definately no diary update in the next
few days. I might write some stuff up on the laptop whilst I'm there and
upload the lot when I get home. Maybe. Depends on whether I can be bothered
to write anything. I've got the days to myself anyhow, so it'll be a little
bit restful. Although if I get too restful I may just be comatose.
A diary spectator asks me to put up what I thought about the elections.
Well, I honestly avoid the news in general because it's depressing, but I
don't like Bush's policies or actions. I've skimmed through transcripts of
two of the debates, IIRC, and I found them to be steeped in attack and
religion - neither of which are particularly redeeming features and didn't
convince me that either candidate was a better choice.
From chatting to people, I think I don't see why religion is a part of the
debates - in places I was seeing (from memory) the candidates using their
religion as part of their argument. I never subscribe to the view that the
politics should have a religious overtone - or even an undertone.
Having listened to them a little and decided that I couldn't come to any
real decision on the matter, I had to really go with my gut and because I'm
aware of Bush and his actions I don't want him around. Yeah, ok that's a bit
naive, but it's just how I thought of things. It's not my country,
so I can justify that I don't need to think about it too much.
As for the voting day itself... well, it's interesting. Kerry conceded
earlier than I'd expected. I expected a drawn out argument. However, I think
he did the right thing - whether he did it because he was tired and knew
he'd lost, or because it was pointless to try to fight, (as I'd like to
hope) because a country that's as divided as it obviously is needs to be
sure of its leader and not have arguments that question his very legitimacy.
I'd like to think it's the latter. I don't know the guy, but I give him the
benefit of the doubt on that.
It was a little disheartening to see that Bush had won. Because it means
we've got another (insert period) of Blair sucking up to him because they're
'best buds'. It's another country - Hannah put it quite well in her diary
(oh my god, I'm back to citing other people's diaries - I'm sorry... I'll
try not to) in saying that she wasn't sure that American's quite understood
the effect that it has on the rest of the world. I'm not entirely sure I
agree as it's a great generalisation - and some might justifiably not care -
but it probably is true. Do we consider the effects that we have on other
parts of the world when we vote in our elections ? Not particularly, because
we vote on who runs our country, and therefore who acts in the best
interests of our country.
Of course, this means that Bush is 'unstoppable'. Having ignored UN
resolutions and the protestations of another country, he's 'liberated'
another country through invasion and depostion of its government and leader,
and having now got a free run of the next four years he can pretty much do
what he wants - who's going to stop him ?
It's easy to pick up on the simple mistakes, problems with speeches, etc,
and put it down to overworked staff, but when it comes to his actions over a
prolonged period, I don't think you can say that it's just a few mistakes.
And to return to the religion that I mentioned as being a part of the
election and his actions, Bush's god appears to be one of the Christian Old
Testament - a god who smites those that have done wrong or displeased him -
rather than the Christian New Testament - where turning the other cheek, and
forgiveness are the order of the day. I don't know what religion he is, and
I don't much care. To be honest, I thought that religion within a developed
society that the USA is meant to be would not be such a big deal. From
speaking to others, I think my viewpoint is naive, but still, that's what I
think.
Watched Battlestar Galactica last night, with Richard Hatch in it as a
terrorist. Interesting idea; and quite a useful examination of their
situation - the original series did touch on the disparity between the
different ships, but not in the same kind of way. And nice to have him on
the show, too. Still very camera wavey.
I hate the start of the month 'cos it means moving files around in the
Diary. It's not a huge deal, but it's just not automated. And it leaves me
with an empty diary which loses anything that was in the diary previously.
Well, not loses, but because the RSS file starts from empty you end up not
seeing those last few entries. Not a huge deal but still frustrating if
there were things there that you thought were worthwhile - like I think the
description of what happens when you Reinitialise Internet was worthwhile.
Actually that's about it for the entire month, so I shouldn't be bothered.
I'm annoyed at myself at the moment. I probably ought apologise to John-Mark
Bell for calling him an idiot on usenet. Because the reason was
correct. Just that I expressed myself the wrong way. For reference, his was
the stupid API in IConv module (which I would question the name of as well,
personally - it's not the same as libiconv if it's using the Unicode
resources, and as it's not it should really have a more descriptive name...
however as I can't actually think of a name that doesn't sound bloody stupid
and I actually like the name IConv, I'm saying nothing). The idea of IConv
is good anyhow. 10/10 for effort; 5/10 for the API, I'm afraid.
And I know I've done crappy APIs before. Look at the PNG module if you want
an interface that is... well, it's not nice. Actually, that's not quite
true. The API itself isn't too bad, but a few SWIs don't actually work
because the interface that they provide requires too many registers to ever
be useful. Fortunately, nobody's actually asked about the PNG library
support so it's not been an issue, and the SWIs in question are quite
specialised. Still doesn't excuse it being crap.
ImageFileConvert's not so nice. Or was it ImageFileRender ? Whichever one it
was that required 10 registers on input to the module, anyhow. I think it
was IFR. Could have been done differently, although possibly not quite as
cleanly.
Anyhow, nasty API - basically a two fingers to BASIC and assembler
programmers. But probably I could have said things better.
Oh, and when you stick a bold claim of "100% portable C" in your sources,
it's probably not a good idea to assume packed structures.
It's 6:30am and Dad's just come in to tell me that my school has burnt down.
Not Methwold. Not Adwick. Not Grove. Not Coddington. Not St Wilfreds. No,
we're going back to my first school - Beeches primary school in
Peterborough.
"The fire is believed to have been started ... in a small alleyway that
leads to a door that opens into the classrooms"
(Peterborough Today,
2,
3).
Given that it's the lower years, I think I know where that is; I can't
really describe it any better than that, but it's the alley that goes down
the far end of the school, farthest away from the upper school area. Of
course, it's a long time since I was at that school!
I have this strange image of a load of fire engines racing down the street
(Craig Street, IIRC) to the school. Very strange.
Oh, and there was an Election in the US... well, still happening as I write
this. Currently 249-221 and Ohio looking very like it's going to go to Bush
even though his percentage lead is dropping as time passes.
It's now 249-225 and 8am. Sleep.
|
Disclaimer: By submitting comments through this form you are implicitly agreeing to allow its reproduction in the diary. I say this not because I'm going to ruthlessly attack comments in the diary, but just so that nobody can say "Well, I didn't say you could quote me on that".