Note that spoilers follow, so stop reading if you don't want to know.
I finally got to see the 'mini-series' of the new Battlestar Galactica
today. Interesting. Where do I start picking holes ? Ok, that may not be
fair for a start because it was actually quite good. And the prejudice you
have to accept is that there were two series (well, one and '1980') of
Galactica to get to know the characters. That's a whole lot of extra
depth of characters to compare against.
Things you remember from the original attack on the colonies would include
the attacks across Caprica and Adama returning home to find what has become
of his family and being confronted by a mob. The former is done more
'spectacularly' by being done in the distant as 'nukes' of the colonies.
Oddly, though, I felt worse when the Mothership returned back to Karak in
Homeworld, having seen the cut-sequence and then seeing the burning planet.
Why ? Maybe that's because it's a game that you're playing, so you feel
involved. Apologies for the comparison between genres there, but as the
planet was bombed that was my immediate thought.
So that's the planet's attack, ok. What about Adama returning home ? Like
Kirk before him (ok, a little bit before!) here's the commander going into
a dangerous situation... seems wrong. Instead, in the new one, we have
Boomer (who's now an asian girl, not a black guy), and her companion (whose
name I forget) making repairs on the planet. Very similar scene, but I
remember it as much darker in the original than the almost reaffirming
version in the new one.
Let's return to the opening. In the original Zak and Apollo (gosh, you'd
think I'd not remember Apollo's brother's name, wouldn't you ?) on patrol
discover a huge array of Cylons planning to attack the fleet under cover of
'peace agreement'. Zak is killed immediately and Apollo escapes to warn the
fleet. In the new, Zak died in an accident years earlier, and was married to
Starbuck (who's a woman now). You'll never stop me liking the old Starbuck,
I'm afraid. The new one just looks like they transplanted the character
without any thought. It doesn't feel right. Plus, of course, the
Apollo-Starbuck friendship is much different now, and that dynamic isn't
going to give the same kind of environment. Ok, so that may not be a bad
thing in itself, but the characters seem isolated from one another in a lot
of ways. That may be the development of characters from the original series
playing with me though.
Baltar being an accomplice to the invasion has been retained, but he's not a
weasely smuggler and trader; he's a genius brought into their fold directly.
He managed to give the Cylons direct access to the military systems that let
them destroy the colonies. This is actually quite a spark of genius in some
respects, because it gives a meaning to his hallucinations as a sense of
guilt. Or maybe he's really a cylon. Personally I reckon he's a Cylon
'sleeper' - the phrase was actually used by his hallucination. On the other
hand, the crew know that he was instrumental in working on the defense
systems and yet he's given unrestricted access to the ship and authority
over other people's lives.
Which brings me to a point of confusion in the story; one moment Baltar
decides to make someone on the bridge a scapegoat for the cylon data device
on the bridge and then he's presenting evidence to Tigh about this. Ok, but
are we to assume that he made that information up and imprisoned him just
because he needed to ? Or did he actually do the tests ? We find out a little
later that the guy was actually a Cylon. Ok. But lucky break, attempt to put
off the humans in their search for more Cylons, or attempt at avoiding
detection himself ? I don't know. I'm not going to worry about it, but it
bothers me a little that we know so little about Baltar (intentionall) and
yet this is left opaque - not because we couldn't know, because we've seen
sections with Baltar on his own previously, but purely because it was assumed
we'd understand or to keep us guessing. I don't like that. Keep us guessing
because things are unanswered, not because things are omitted. The "what you
didn't know was that Baltar didn't even test the guy's hair" method of plot
manipulation is poor - I don't need to see such things most of the time, but
when it's actually crucial to the character it needs a little explanation.
Especially when everyone around him believes every word he says without
question.
Ok, now let's talk a little bit about things that have been carried over
neatly. 'cos I liked them. The general ship shape has been retained, but
to be honest it's been 'sleeked' too much - why bother ? What's with the
hangar bays retracting, too ? In a military ship are you really wanting a 3
minute period to deploy a landing bay ? The ships of the fleet - we never
saw the other Battlestars, so I couldn't really comment on them; we did in
the original, but there's the magical reappearance of one of the Battlestars
in the mid-original series still to come, if they retain that. The convoy,
though, was good. They retained a lot of the ships that you knew from the
original. As an aside, I do rather like the inclusion of a prison ship in
the convoy. It may not be the most appealing of notions for the last
remnants of humanity, but it does give a better cross section, I think.
Now, here's a cute (but sad) bit. One of the things you assume about a
programme is that the time taken to meet and interact with characters is
important. I guess you also get used to it in games. If there's a button, it
does something and it's important to the progression of the game. If there's
a hallway with no apparent purpose, you probably didn't pay enough
attention. It's less true in games now, but there's still something in it.
It's more common in series, particularly where you have to introduce the
characters quickly to get the watcher 'into' the programme. So, when the
President (there's a President in this version; I'll say more in a bit)
collects her surviving fleet and they're assessing the state of the ships
they come to one of the argicultural ships. From memory these are in the
original so you're immediately thinking 'yay', cute. And you meet one of the
guys on the ship, and a little girl who's going to meet her parents on
Caprica. There's a little time spent on it. Usually this wouldn't have been
wasted as the ship's going to be destroyed in about 5 minutes time, but
the whole scene and build up is meant to leave you wondering what was going
to happen and shake you away from both your comfortable knowledge that the
people you have got to 'know' and expect to live will, and also that you
shouldn't make assumptions that things will be the same (as if you needed
it really). But it was a good one for those that remember the show, because
you shouldn't assume that the things you know will be safe.
Ok, the President. It's a woman. No problem with that. She's well down the
leadership chain, fair enough. But Adama and she seem set to fight. Or maybe
not. In the original, Adama was the fleet commander, and Tigh provided the
military viewpoint, as I recall. Adama was adamant that the politics laid
down by one of the other ships (this is a couple of episodes in and
therefore clouding things) were disruptive. Here, we have the President
making plans and, if not calling the shots, taking a reasonable amount of
control from Adama. Original Adama could have done with that sort of
presence, rather than taking all the weight himself. New Adama doesn't seem
to need or want it. It seems intended to give a clash - in this sort of
situation, with friends and family dead and fleeing for their lives you can
expect clashes over much lesser things so as a plot device it seems a little
unnecessary. But ok.
So we come to other unnecessary plot devices. Tigh's an alcoholic who's got
marriage problems, and isn't seen to be able to command in the new one. In
the old he was solid, and Adama could rely on him implicitly. Actually Tigh
does kinda fit with the new series though. The ship's a museum piece and
there hasn't been fighting for 40 years so any exec officer wouldn't
necessarily have the chance to fight and so they might not be as focused as
original Tigh. But anyhow, it doesn't seem necessary to the plot.
Use of sex on the series - unnecessary. Is it to attract an older audience ?
Why ? Galactica original never needed it, so why do we need it now ? You
don't have to have sex scenes or people fondling one another to show that
they're involved. I'm not sure that there's much that the characters (as
development goes) get much out of that. Obviously this is Baltar/#6 (she's
referred to in other places as #6, but I didn't notice it in the programme).
What about Baltar's amazing appearance where Boomer landed. Ok, so if we
accept that Baltar's a sleeper, and we saw at the end that Boomer is a
sleeper/plant then the 'coincidence' of landing nearby is reasonable.
Another case might be that the #6 Baltar was with informed Boomer of the
location, but why save Baltar ? The other case that Baltar is truely
accidentally involved as an instrument seems to 'lucky' for him and the
fleet. The question 'why tell Baltar anything' when they're alone springs to
mind. Like evil geniuses all the way back beyond 'Bond' she spills important
information to him. If he's a sleeper then maybe he died in the explosion
and his memory was transferred to another that was nearby, but in which case
why tell him that.
The cylons are machines. They're logical. They're singleminded. They've
chosen to infiltrate their creator's world by creating exact replicas, which
makes sense because it's purely an end to a means. They don't care that they
look like the people they despise. They just do it as to ensure that the
humans are made dead. So why disclose information to Baltar. If he ever
discloses any information gleaned from the Cylons he becomes a suspect
because he shouldn't know those things as he wasn't involved in the attack.
That's been made pretty plain and up front. But, even if he were to
admit or be found out, the question of why he should be told anything, or
why anything he's been told should be trusted is brought in to question.
Anyhow.
We know there are 12 models because of the dubious information given to
Baltar by #6. Ok. We know that one looks like #6. One looks like the
smuggler on the ammunition dump. One looks like the guy in the operations
room who Baltar found. And one looks like Boomer. That makes four. Do we
care ? Not overly, because we know who the primary mole is. And like in 24
(series 1!), we've expecting that there might be someone else after the
primary is found out. Which is a pity because I quite liked Boomer (new
one).
I've already mentioned the replacement of the male characters with females.
Ok. But look again; Tigh was a strong black guy. Boomer was a black guy.
Boomer's now asian, yes, but no other black people. I don't recall any other
black people in the new one at all. Apparently the guy who plays Adama is
Hispanic in real life. Ok. Maybe it's just odd to me that that diversity has
been lost. It's replaced by another, but we've become used to, and accept
that space series won't just have the token non-caucasian, but that they'll
be an integral part of the programme. Maybe.
Or maybe it's me that's prejudiced because I don't see what I'm
expecting. After all, there's no russian, scottish, french or any other of
the groups that can be more readily recognised.
Technology. Yeah, ok. We're talking about ships that can travel using faster
than light drives (nice touch in not explaining 'FTL', by the way - it's
assumed that you'll all know - and I'm not even sure whether I'm being
sarcastic there). And yet the attack is based on using 'nukes'. Galactica
was hit by a nuke in her midships. Now, from what I remember from reading, a
50 megatonne nuke is a lot. 15 kilotonne was used to destroy Hiroshima; 21
kilotonne on Nagasaki. In general we assume that the Galactica is the size
of a small city. A nuke around the centre of the ship is probably going to
do a reasonable amount of damage, I think. I'm thinking more along the lines
of gaping hole, rather than 'few fires'.
Instead of thinking of a nuclear weapon (which should be a trivial design
and production problem for they Cylons), think of a FTL drive encased in a
projectile / depth-charge weapon. We assume that the FTL drive is small, as
it can be fitted to a scout ship like Boomer's, so this isn't unreasonable.
There are now three choices; either you use it as an 'overload' system,
basically using the energy that would have been dissipated by FTL to direct
the attack. You could use it to transport another weapon to its target (why
not - you just traverse the distance 'instantly', removing the possilibity
of interception). Or you use it to transport another in the manner that it
is intended and transport the nearby objects to another location - remember
you don't need to define a destination because, after all you're trying to
kill people. If you really need to define a destination because of
the physics of the universe you're in, then define it as the centre of the
planet - you'll destablise the core with an ingress of matter and that can't
be good - and set every weapon to use that as the destination.
Personally I like this last option it means that you get many different
forms of devastation, which accumulate to remove the possibility of life
around the target. You have the fact that you've possibly just transported
a city (we said the Galactica had FTL and was about the size of a city)
somewhere that it shouldn't be. If that was the centre of the planet then
you've just disrupted it and you're going to get earthquakes that are much
more ranged than the single point of impact. You've got the effect of a few
thousand km3 of matter suddenly not being where it was. That's
going to cause a whole big problem for the remaining atmosphere of the
planet. Oh and of course there's the fact that the matter I just mentioned
included people who, whereever they end up, aren't going to be doing much.
So, after planning the military application of a FTL transport engine, the
point is that a nuclear weapon (ok, not in the 50 megatonne range) is 60
year old technology for us. A FTL transport engine is something we couldn't
put a timescale on developing because it's apparently impossible (at least
to the best of my knowledge of physics). So you'd think they'd come up with
something more powerful. Or maybe not 'powerful' but more different than
such a weapon we know, and have known for longer than some of us have been
alive.
Anyhow... after all that rambling what do I really think. I think it's
pretty good. It has its rough edges in places and differences from the
original, but it looks interesting. I can see why it would have a bad
reception, and I can see why some changes have been made. So long as we
ignore the preceeding series, it seems like it could be worth watching.
Well, maybe not ignore, but treat it as is intended - a 're-imagining'. You
can't say it hasn't been pushed that it's not the same as the original.
![[Quote]](../images/quoteleft.gif) |
Beka: Been there, done that, got the t-shirt
Rami: Oh, that explains your wardrobe
[ Got the t-shirt; Beka Valentine; Andromeda ]
|
![[Quote]](../images/quoteright.gif) |
Disclaimer: By submitting comments through this form you are implicitly agreeing to allow its reproduction in the diary. I say this not because I'm going to ruthlessly attack comments in the diary, but just so that nobody can say "Well, I didn't say you could quote me on that".